name: "✨ Feature Request" about: "Request a feature to be implemented in the port." title: "feat: " labels: - "FeatureRequest/New" body: - type: "markdown" id: "text-introduction" attributes: value: | Hey there! Thank you for taking the time to request a feature to us. \ Before filling any of this out, please think for one minute if the feature is really important and necessary enough to implement in the port. If you're unsure, continue. \ Please answer the following questions accurately, or we may not be able to implement the feature as you requested it. \ \ **Please check if the same feature request already exists. If so, participate in that one instead. If another issue is similar, make sure to mention the related issues.** \ **Please don't censor anything *except* sensitive information. You don't need to be embarrased about your username. You censor your bug report, we censor our answers.** \ **Submitting a feature request will *not* gurantee it's inclusion into the port. By submitting a feature request, you are at the grace of the community to pick up your suggestion.** - type: "textarea" id: "feature-description" attributes: label: "Feature description" description: "Explain *what* you want added. Include as many details as possible." placeholder: | Example: I want to do X in my project, which would simplify doing Y. validations: required: true - type: "textarea" id: "feature-implementation" attributes: label: "Feature implementation" description: | Explain *how* you want it added. Include as many details as possible. Also explore alternative ways of implementing the feature in EngineMC (if possible). placeholder: | Example: I would propose to . I've also thought on simply . validations: required: true - type: "textarea" id: "feature-alternatives" attributes: label: "Feature alternatives" description: | Explain how to implement the feature without building it into the port directly. Include as many details as possible. placeholder: | Example: I've considered writing a plugin just for this purpose. Otherwise it would be possible to use with some configuration. I've also considered using the normal way of doing it by . validations: required: false - type: "markdown" id: "text-tysm" attributes: value: | Thank you for filling out this feature request form. Please check your answers for *mistaeks* before sending this report.